Inversion and Contrast Polarity Reversal Affect both Encoding and Recognition Processes of Unfamiliar Faces: A Repetition Study Using ERPs
By Roxane J. Itier, Margot J. Taylor. NeuroImage, 2002
549 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cae64aed622141ff00f9f44efbd13cbcefcc2d38
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Bruno Rossion
- Roxane J. Itier
- Corentin Jacques
- Anthony Randal McIntosh
- Nancy J. Lobaugh
- Margot J. Taylor
- James W. Tanaka
- Albert L. Porterfield
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Bruno Rossion
- Anthony Randal McIntosh
- Nancy J. Lobaugh
- Roxane J. Itier
- Corentin Jacques
- Margot J. Taylor
- James W. Tanaka
- Garrison W. Cottrell
Citations in the corpus
- N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. (2004, methodology): “…latency and/or amplitude of this component for upside-down faces (Bentin et al., 1996; Linkenkaer-Hansen et al., 1998; Rossion et al., 1999, 2000; Taylor et al., 2001; Itier and Taylor, 2002), that is not found for inverted objects (Bentin et al., 1996; Rossion et al., 2000; Rebai et al., 2001).”
- Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170 (2008, background): “…can be observed on the P1 (e.g. Itier and Taylor, 2002, 2004a), these effects are much stronger and more consistent on the N170 (e.g. Eimer, 2000b; Itier and Taylor, 2002, 2004a; Linkenkaer-Hansen et al., 1998; Rebai et al., 2001; Rossion et al., 1999, 2000, 2003; Rousselet et al., 2004a; Sagiv…”
- Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex (2003, background): “…coincidence of the N170 and VPP, their opposite polarity, and surface localization, as well as their remarkable functional similarity (e.g., Itier and Taylor, 2002; Rossion et al., 1999a, 1999b; see Jeffreys, 1996) strongly suggest that these two peaks form part of the same dipolar complex.”
- Neural bases of eye and gaze processing: the core of social cognition. (2009, unknown): “…region as the main source of this component (Batty and Taylor, 2003; Henson et al., 2003; Itier et al., 2006a,b; Itier and Taylor, 2004b; Watanabe et al., 2003) while others have reported the FG (Itier and Taylor, 2002; Rossion et al., 2003b; Schweinberger et al., 2002; Watanabe et al., 2003) (Fig.”
- Three Stages of Facial Expression Processing: ERP Study with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (2009, background): “Some source localization studies concluded that the VPP and N170 components are derived from the same neural dipole located in or near the fusiform gyrus (Rossion et al., 1999; Itier and Taylor, 2002; Joyce and Rossion, 2005), while other studies suggested that there are two independent neural gener”
- Activation of Preexisting and Acquired Face Representations: The N250 Event-related Potential as an Index of Face Familiarity (2006, background): “Although the human capacity the latency of the N170 can be delayed by inverting for storing face memories is remarkable, relatively little the face stimulus (Rossion et al., 2000) or by reversing is known about the learning conditions and neurophysits luminance values (Itier & Taylor, 2002).”
- Partial least squares analysis of neuroimaging data: applications and advances. (2004, methodology): “Application: ERP experiments We demonstrate the application of ST-PLS for ERP data in a study examining the impact of configural manipulations on face processing (Itier and Taylor, 2002; Itier et al., 2004).”
- Interpretive bias in social phobia: An ERP study with morphed emotional schematic faces (2009, background): “…face processing is currently not well understood: Since the P1 is smaller for negative (contrast reversed) than inverted or upright faces (Itier & Taylor, 2002), and larger for unattractive and atypical faces compared with attractive and typical faces (Halit et al., 2000), it has been ascribed a…”