Does emotional intelligence meet traditional standards for an intelligence? Some new data and conclusions.

By R. Roberts, M. Zeidner, Gerald Matthews. Emotion, 2001

665 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aa2507d7257c1ff04872510743bca0200efd68a7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Validity and Reliability of a Brief Emotional Intelligence Scale (BEIS-10) (2010, background): “Self-perceptions may not be particularly accurate or even available to conscious interpretation making them vulnerable to the entire gamut of response sets and social desirability factors afflicting self-report measures (e.g., deception and impression management) (Roberts et al., 2001).”
Convergent and divergent validity of integrative versus mixed model measures of emotional intelligence (2013, neutral): “…typically used proxy, and less time-consuming, measures of IQ or restricted their analyses to particular subtests of IQ measures (e.g., Brackett & Mayer, 2003; Ciarrochi et al., 2000; MacCann et al., 2004; O'Connor & Little, 2003; Roberts et al., 2001; Schulte et al., 2004; Zeidner et al., 2005).”
Trait emotional intelligence: behavioural validation in two studies of emotion recognition and reactivity to mood induction (2003, background): “As has been noted elsewhere (Roberts et al., 2001), the progress that has been achieved in the area of facial expression of emotion (Ekman, 1999; Keltner & Ekman, 2000) makes it possible to devise tasks that can be objectively scored according to veridical criteria.”
ON WHY “EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE” WILL NOT PREDICT LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS BEYOND IQ OR THE “BIG FIVE”: AN EXTENSION AND REJOINDER (2004, background): “It is known that El measures are plagued with problems regarding their validity and reliability (see Davies, Stankov, Roberts, 1998; Matthews et al., 2002; MacCann, Matthews, Zeidner, Roberts, 2003; Roberts, Zeidner, & Matthews, 2001; Zeidner et al., 2004; Zeidner,.Matthew, & Roberts, 2001).”
Emotional Intelligence, its Measurement and Implications for the Workplace (2008, background): “Roberts et al. (2001) suggested that EI measures are measures of conformity rather than abilities, primarily because of the way in which they are scored, i.e. according to normative ideas as to what is the ‘right’ way to respond.”