Firm resources, competitive actions and performance: investigating a mediated model with evidence from the in‐vitro diagnostics industry

By Hermann Achidi Ndofor, David G. Sirmon, Xiaoming He. 2011

417 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a93ddc476248829e7efb0411f898c94f8be8a776

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The formation and interplay of social capital in crowdfunded social ventures (2014, background): “…theory In traditional investment theory, discovering (or creating) an opportunity may result in a potent and not easy to imitate asset (Barney, Ketchen, and Wright 2011; Ndofor, Sirmon, and He 2011) that can lead to a competitive advantage (Ndofor, Sirmon, and He 2011; Sirmon et al. 2010).”
Resource Orchestration to Create Competitive Advantage (2011, background): “With managerial action being essential for realizing competitive advantage from resources a firm owns (Ndofor et al., 2011), and these resources somewhat dependent on the firm’s stage of development, it is important to explore resource orchestration efforts across the life cycle of a firm.”
Resource orchestration in family firms: investigating how entrepreneurial orientation, generational involvement, and participative strategy affect performance (2011, background): “Thus, resource orchestration ‘is concerned with the actions leaders take to facilitate efforts to effectively manage the fi rm’s resources’ (Hitt et al., 2011: 64; Ndofor, Sirmon, and He, 2011).”
Sample Selection Bias and Heckman Models in Strategic Management Research (2016, background): “…board membership (e.g., Quigley and Hambrick, 2012), diversification and M&A activity (e.g., Kim, Hoskisson, and Lee, 2015), executive compensation (e.g., Chen, 2015), capital market activity (e.g., Arikan and Capron, 2010), and competition and factor markets (e.g., Ndofor, Sirmon, and He, 2011).”
Social Capital and Learning Advantages: A Problem of Absorptive Capacity (2014, background): “…the Sobel test Z-value must exceed 1.645 for 5% significance (or 1.282 for 10% significance) and the effect ratio should exceed 0.8; for partial mediation, the Sobel test Z-value must exceed 1.645 (or 1.282 for 10% significance) and the effect ratio be lower than 0.8 (Ndofor, Sirmon, and He, 2011).”
Caught in the crossfire: Dimensions of vulnerability and foreign multinationals' exit from war‐afflicted countries (2017, neutral): “Since iterative comparisons of business processes in different contexts increase the rate at which firms respond to turbulence (Ndofor, Sirmon, and He, 2011), experienced MNEs may exit even faster using foreign exit routines developed elsewhere.”
Less is More, or Not? On the Interplay between Bundles of Slack Resources, Firm Performance and Firm Survival (2015, positive): “Relative to fixed- and random-effects models, the GEE model provides more consistent and robust regression parameters when autocorrelation because of non-independence is present (Ndofor et al., 2011).”