Conflict without Misperceptions or Incomplete Information

292 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Natural Resources and Violent Conflict (2014, background): “Garfinkel & Skaperdas (2000) and Mehlum et al. (2006) also explore this last issue.”
A Review of Recent Advances and Future Directions in the Quantitative Literature on Civil War (2002, background): “Garfinkel and Skaperdas (2000) show that incomplete information is not a necessary condition for conflict in a long-run model if the short-run costs to fighting are less than the long-term gains of weakening potential opponents so that they cannot pose threats in the future.”
A generalized Tullock contest (2011, background): “Garfinkel and Skaperdas (2000) consider a case in which two players compete to win a war.”
Exploring the Bargaining Model of War (2003, methodology): “For other examples of costly lottery models, see Bueno de Mesquita et al. 1999; Garfinkel and Skaperdas 2000; Bearce and Fisher 2002.”
Economic Shocks and Civil War (2009, background): “Besides producing, a group can try to seize land and crops from its neighbor by violent means.”