A Review of Recent Advances and Future Directions in the Quantitative Literature on Civil War
By Nicholas Sambanis. 2002
412 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dbbd2af1d60678bf175e223e71d7656cec690139
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Håvard Strand
- James C. Murdoch
- Todd Sandler
- Gudrun Østby
- Mohammad Zulfan Tadjoeddin
- S. Murshed
- James Kai Sing Kung
- Sylvain Chassang
Citations in the corpus
- Economic Shocks and Civil War (2009, background): “7See Sambanis (2002) and Miguel and Blattman (2009) for overviews of this literature. of variation across countries.”
- Civil wars and economic growth: A regional comparison (2002, background): “Sambanis (2002) provides an excellent up-to-date overview of the recent literature on civil wars.”
- Climate Shocks and Sino-nomadic Conflict (2011, background): “…have identified a variety of factors, ranging from labor market conditions (Collier & Hoeffler, 1998, 2001, 2002) and economic growth (Elbadawi & Sambanis, 2002; Fearon & Laitin, 2003; Miguel et al., 2004) to ethnic fractionalization and democracy (Sambanis, 2002), as having an effect on the…”
- Population Pressure, Horizontal Inequality and Political Violence: A Disaggregated Study of Indonesian Provinces, 1990–2003 (2011, background): “The consensus is that conflict risk is lower in established democracies with high per-capita income levels (Sambanis, 2002 ).”
- State Capacity, Conflict and Development (2009, neutral): “The causes of civil war are subject to a large theoretical and empirical literature in political science and economics (see e.g., Sambanis, 2002 and Blattman and Miguel, 2009 for broad reviews).”
- Political opportunity structures, democracy, and civil war (2010, background): “In turn, empirical research on civil war has considered a variety of measures intended to reflect either grievances that could give rise to motives for protest or opportunities for resort to violence (see e.g. Sambanis, 2002, 2004, for useful reviews).”