Cross-Cultural Similarities and Differences in Dynamic Stereotypes: A Comparison Between Germany and the United States

By Annett Wilde, Amanda Diekman. 2005

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a817596ba331d2d5a1776b45b5802a2257cd840f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. M. Steffens
2. Amanda Diekman
3. Wind Goodfriend
4. Alexandra Kroth
5. Irena D. Ebert
6. A. Eagly
7. Ursula Kessels

In Social Psychology

1. Wind Goodfriend
2. M. Steffens
3. Alexandra Kroth
4. Irena D. Ebert
5. Petra Jelenec
6. Amanda Diekman
7. Sabine Sczesny
8. A. Eagly

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Wind Goodfriend
2. M. Steffens
3. Amanda Diekman
4. Alexandra Kroth
5. Irena D. Ebert
6. Petra Jelenec
7. A. Eagly
8. Sabine Sczesny

Citations in the corpus

• Warm, but Maybe Not So Competent?—Contemporary Implicit Stereotypes of Women and Men in Germany (2014, background): “However, especially with regard to previous research on gender stereotypes, several studies have shown a striking generality of gender beliefs across participants’ age and background (e.g., Diekman and Eagly 2000; Schein 2001; Wilde and Diekman 2005).”
• Separating Implicit Gender Stereotypes regarding Math and Language: Implicit Ability Stereotypes are Self-serving for Boys and Men, but not for Girls and Women (2011, background): “stereotypes of men were far less dynamic ( Wilde and Diekman 2005 ).”
• Rolling with the Changes: A Role Congruity Perspective on Gender Norms (2006, background): “These analyses showed that, to the extent that participants perceived a nontraditional division of labor, they projected men and women to adopt counterstereotypic characteristics (e.g., Diekman & Eagly, 2000; Wilde & Diekman, 2005).”