Recent trends in the research on national innovation systems

By M. Balzat, Horst Hanusch. 2004

303 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a73ccf36ae26453f6f65412a15b336d34ebac9f9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. S. Jakobsen
2. S. Metcalfe
3. Kalanit Efrat
4. Arnt Fløysand
5. John Foster
6. G. Van Huylenbroeck
7. Kaihua Chen
8. Henry Etzkowitz

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Yuzhuo Cai
2. S. Jakobsen
3. S. Metcalfe
4. Kalanit Efrat
5. Arnt Fløysand
6. John Foster
7. Kaihua Chen
8. Henry Etzkowitz

In Strategy and Management

1. Yuzhuo Cai
2. E. Malecki
3. Kalanit Efrat
4. Jiancheng Guan
5. S. Jakobsen
6. S. Metcalfe
7. Arnt Fløysand
8. John Foster

Citations in the corpus

• Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present, and future (2020, background): “Others suggest that it has limited explanatory power for many practical issues (Brundin, Wigren, Isaacs, Friedrich, & Visser, 2008; Giuliani & Arza, 2009; Tuunainen, 2002), particularly when comparing between different contexts (Balzat & Hanusch, 2004; Cai, 2014; Mowery & Sampat 2004).”
• Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems (2012, background): “As Balzat and Hanusch (2004) have argued, the NIS approach still lacks coherent theoretical backing and the methodology necessary to allow for more systemic, empirical comparisons among countries.”
• The direct and indirect impact of culture on innovation (2014, background): “As noted, innovation has been found to have a strong and positive influence on economic growth (Freeman, 1995, 2002; Thoenig and Verdier, 2003; Balzat and Hanusch, 2004; Chell, 2001), As economistsʼ ideas shifted from dependence on tangible resources to accumulation of intangible resources such as…”
• The complexity of innovation: A relational turn (2011, background): “Some studies have warned against this practice because it presupposes the innovation process to be a phenomenon that can be controlled and guided (Balzat and Hanusch, 2004; Lundvall, 2007).”
• Innovation systems perspectives on developing-country agriculture: a critical review (2005, methodology): “This type of marriage enhances the study of economic growth by providing new perspectives and indicators that better capture and measure innovative capacities (Balzat and Hanusch, 2004).”
• Cities and Regions Competing in the Global Economy: Knowledge and Local Development Policies (2007, background): “A systemic approach to innovation policy may simply conflict with benchmarking techniques because of the heterogeneity among innovation systems (Balzat and Hanusch, 2004).”
• The Organizational Innovation System: A systemic framework for radical innovation at the organizational level (2016, background): “Moreover, due to the globalizing economy, the international or global innovation system (IIS or GIS) is increasingly receiving attention (Balzat and Hanusch, 2004; Chung, 2002; Freeman, 2002; FromholdEisebith, 2007; Walshok et al., 2014).”
• Systems thinking, market failure, and the development of innovation policy: The case of Australia (2011, background): “…Fosterc, Stan Metcalfed a School of Business, University of Queensland, Australia b Centre for Business Research, Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom c School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia d Manchester University, United Kingdom a r t i c l e i n f o”
• Rural innovation systems and networks: findings from a study of Ethiopian smallholders (2011, background): “For a wider discussion of new directions in the innovation systems literature, including their application to the study of innovation in developing countries, see Balzat and Hanusch (2004).”