A new statistical method for estimating the usual intake of episodically consumed foods with application to their distribution.

By Janet Tooze, D. Midthune, K. Dodd, L. Freedman, S. Krebs-Smith, A. Subar, P. Guenther, Raymond J. Carroll, V. Kipnis. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 2006

633 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a73e838e1e4a9df02ed6655eecba99d5e7a2333f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. A. Subar
2. F. Thompson
3. S. Krebs-Smith
4. A. Moshfegh
5. J. Dwyer
6. K. Dodd
7. Clifford L. Johnson
8. N. Ahluwalia

In Sociology and Political Science

1. A. Subar
2. M. Picciano
3. F. Thompson

Citations in the corpus

• Dietary Assessment Methodology (2017, methodology): “The NCI recently developed a new usual intake model that is an improvement over previous statistical methods [303].”
• Statistical methods for estimating usual intake of nutrients and foods: a review of the theory. (2006, methodology): “This article serves as background for two companion articles (12,13).”
• Update on NHANES Dietary Data: Focus on Collection, Release, Analytical Considerations, and Uses to Inform Public Policy (2016, methodology): “The NCI method is particularly useful for describing the habitual intakes of foods and nutrients that are not routinely eaten (“episodically consumed”) (3, 6, 50, 54), because it allows the probability to consume an episodic food to be related to the amount consumed when it is consumed.”
• Americans do not meet federal dietary recommendations. (2010, methodology): “A 1- or 2-part nonlinear mixed model was used, depending on whether or not the food in question was consumed daily by almost everyone (6).”
• CONSUMPTION PATTERNS OF SUGAR SWEETENED BEVERAGES IN THE UNITED STATES (2013, neutral): “Children 1999–2000 204 (43) 147 (48) 167 (19) 126 (25) 2001–2002 200 (44) 145 (49) 173 (19) 103 (26) 2003–2004 195 (43) 132 (49) 179 (18) 91 (26) 2005–2006 173 (43) 115 (48) 157 (18) 96 (25) 2007–2008 178 (43) 129 (49) 153 (18) 84 (25) N=6,398 N=3,959 N=3,871 N=775 Adolescents 1999–2000 363 (77) 300”
• Estimation of total usual calcium and vitamin D intakes in the United States. (2010, methodology): “The National Cancer Institute (NCI) method (16) was used to produce usual nutrient intake estimates utilizing the amount-only part of the NCI method.”