Generous Paupers and Stingy Princes: Power Drives Consumer Spending on Self versus Others
By Derek D. Rucker, David Dubois, Adam D. Galinsky. 2011
327 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Safety Research, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a71b9ce6ced59f7054f311914da65f1498c4c1cf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Derek D. Rucker
- Adam D. Galinsky
- E. Wan
- David Dubois
- Ying Ding
- Jack S. Tillotson
- Vito Tassiello
- A. Rome
In Safety Research
- Adam D. Galinsky
- E. Wan
- Ying Ding
- Derek D. Rucker
- David Dubois
- Francesca Gino
- Maryam Kouchaki
- Max H. Bazerman
In Social Psychology
- Derek D. Rucker
- Adam D. Galinsky
- David Dubois
- Francesca Gino
- Jack S. Tillotson
- Vito Tassiello
- A. Rome
- E. Wan
Citations in the corpus
- Dynamics of Communicator and Audience Power: The Persuasiveness of Competence versus Warmth (2016, result): “Although power does not typically affect mood (Briñol et al. 2007; Rucker et al. 2011; Smith and Galinsky 2010; Smith and Trope 2006), we measured and controlled for differences in mood given prior research documents that mood can affect the messages communicators generate (Bohner and Schwarz…”
- To Be or Not to Be Unique? The Effect of Social Exclusion on Consumer Choice (2014, methodology): “After completing the reading of the story, participants were asked to describe their feelings in detail as if they were experiencing the incident in the story, a procedure adapted from past research (Rucker, Dubois, and Galinsky 2011) to strengthen the manipulation.”
- The Compensatory Consumer Behavior Model: How self-discrepancies drive consumer behavior (2017, unknown): “In addition, in an experiment reported by Rucker, Dubois, and Galinsky (2011), individuals in a low-power condition reported feeling more powerful after receiving a pen associated with status, but they did not feel any more powerful after receiving a pen associated with quality.”
- Power and consumer behavior: How power shapes who and what consumers value (2012, methodology): “Indeed, Rucker et al. (2011b) found that individuals in a state of low-power desired high-status objects more than individuals placed in a high-power state, but this effect was strongest for individuals with a high generalized sense of power (i.e., chronic power, see Anderson & Galinsky, 2006).”
- “Alexa, order me a pizza!”: The mediating role of psychological power in the consumer–voice assistant interaction (2021, background): “…experiencing a lower sense of power view themselves as more dependent on others (Rucker & Galinsky, 2016), spend more money on others than themselves (Rucker et al., 2011), and place more emphasis on visible or conspicuous consumption to signal their status to others (Rucker & Galinsky, 2009).”
- The impact of IT capabilities on firm performance: The mediating roles of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility (2013, unknown): “Given that the market has become increasingly uncertain, managers now consider creating flexible IT infrastructure as a critical capability that allows firms to achieve superior performance [56].”