Creativity and Occupational Accomplishments Among Intellectually Precocious Youths: An Age 13 to Age 33 Longitudinal Study.

By Jonathan Wai, David Lubinski, C. Benbow. 2005

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a6547cae0a3127e0a2454a0393a51d317cc6a5a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Brother–sister differences in the g factor in intelligence: analysis of full, opposite-sex siblings from the NLSY1979 (2007, background): “The previous consensus that there was a cut-off beyond which further increments in IQ do not increase levels of attainment has been refuted ( Wai, Lubinski, & Benbow, 2005 ).”
Best Practices in Identifying Students for Gifted and Talented Education Programs (2011, background): “, patents, literary publications) are related to domain-specific academic strengths (Park et al., 2007, 2008; Wai et al., 2005).”
Becoming an expert in the musical domain: It takes more than just practice (2008, unknown): “Furthermore, there is evidence from other studies for individual differences in elite groups predicting achievement when the sample size is large enough, for example in a study of close to 2000 intellectually precocious youth by Wai, Lubinski, and Benbow (2005).”
Spatial Ability: A Neglected Dimension In Talent Searches For Intellectually Precocious Youth (2007, background): “…2004; Colangelo et al., 2004; Lubinski, Webb, et al., 2001; Shea et al., 2001), as well as for occupa- tional success and creativity (Benbow, Lubinski, Shea, & Eftekhari-Sanjani, 2000; Lubinski, Benbow, Webb, & BleskeRechek, 2006; Park et al., in press; VanTassel-Baska, 1998; Wai et al., 2005).”
Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, economic, or social equality (2015, background): “Our final conclusion is that individual boys, on average, have better mathematics skills than reading skills, whereas individual girls have, on average, better reading skills than mathematics skills, as noted by Valla and Ceci (2014), Wang et al. (2013) and Wai et al. (2005).”
Sex differences in reasoning abilities: Surprising evidence that male–female ratios in the tails of the quantitative reasoning distribution have increased (2013, background): “Such findings have important implications for the societal goal of increasing the representation of women in elite STEM fields, because quantitative reasoning skills have been shown to be important predictors of participation in such careers (Park et al., 2007; Wai et al., 2005).”
Sex differences in the right tail of cognitive abilities: A 30 year examination (2010, background): “…haveshownthatabilitydifferencesalone(measuredasscoreson the SAT-M) within the top 1% make a difference in earning low base rate achievements such as a STEM PhD, publication, patent, or tenure at a top university (Park et al., 2007; Park, Lubinski, & Benbow, 2008; Wai, Lubinski, & Benbow, 2005).”
The Neuroscience of Intelligence (2016, background): “Follow-up results show that many of these mathematically precocious children, as determined by a single test score when they were in their early teens, became exceptionally successful in terms of occupational and life success (Lubinski et al., 1996, 2006, 2014; Robertson et al., 2010; Wai et al., 20”
Is creativity without intelligence possible? A Necessary Condition Analysis (2016, methodology): “, 2013) revealed different thresholds for different aspects of creative ability and no curvilinear relationship (though a significant linear relationship) between intelligence and creative achievement (cf. Park, Lubinski, & Benbow, 2007, 2008;Wai et al., 2005).”
Accomplishment in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) and Its Relation to STEM Educational Dose: A 25-Year Longitudinal Study (2010, background): “For example, other findings have suggested that SAT-M differences of around 160 points are required for this population to double the gain ratio of the outcomes under analysis here (Wai et al., 2005).”
From Terman to Today (2016, background): “In a subsequent study conducted 10 years later (Wai et al., 2005), 20-year occupational data were plotted within this three-region space.”