Mapping the dialogical self: towards a rationale and method of assessment

By P. Raggatt. 2000

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a63cfdecf41da6a2aedf3108042666c1a3e97e25

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. H. Hermans
2. Paul J Silvia
3. G. Gendolla
4. Alastair Henry
5. James C. Kaufman
6. Charles Fernyhough
7. Scott Barry Kaufman
8. Emily M. Grossnickle

In Social Psychology

1. G. Gendolla
2. Paul J Silvia
3. H. Hermans
4. Emily C. Nusbaum
5. T. Kashdan
6. Roger E. Beaty
7. Robert Henson
8. Jonathan Templin

Citations in the corpus

• THE CONSTRUCTION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF A DIALOGICAL SELF (2003, methodology): “Recently, Roland (2001) pointed out that people from Eastern cultures like India and Japan show a self that is more a we-self, or an I-self that is far more contextually experienced in dialogical relationships than is typical of Northern Europeans and North Americans.”
• The Construction of a Personal Position Repertoire: Method and Practice (2001, background): “These questions were included in the position repertoire following an idea proposed by Raggatt (2000), who included similar questions in his ‘personality web’, a semi-structured interview for mapping the dialogical self.”
• On Introspection and Self-Perception: Does Self-Focused Attention Enable Accurate Self-Knowledge? (2001, background): “Dialogical theories of the self (Hermans, 1996; Raggatt, 2000) most explicitly reject the unified, coherent, vectored, executive self.”