Intellectual capital: Measurement effectiveness

By G. Kannan, W. Aulbur. 2004

284 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a61e1b4b484bda3b13c9b9f5f301751fe5e72110

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The Evolving research on intellectual capital (2008, background): “Kannan and Aulbur (2004) propose a three-step model for IC measurement shown in”
Knowledge management and measurement: a critical review (2013, background): “Nevertheless, they have been criticised for their dependence on individual judgements, with the associated dangers of subjectivity and bias (Kannan and Aulbur, 2004).”
Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation Performance: Evidence from the Chinese Construction Industry (2019, background): “knowledge, skills, and experiences of an enterprises’ employees and managers that can be used to promote innovation activities to a certain extent [79].”
Intellectual capital and business performance in the pharmaceutical sector of Jordan (2010, methodology): “The use of perceptual measures in intellectual capital research has been studied extensively by Kannan and Aulbur (2004).”
The impact of higher education on entrepreneurial intention and human capital (2018, background): “However, this task has proven to be difficult to achieve due to the complex nature of these assets and the large number of organisational and individual variables that must be taken into account (Kannan and Aulbur, 2004; Choong, 2008; Grimaldi et al., 2013).”
The role of intellectual capital in the success of new ventures (2011, background): “The analysis of the organisation's culture is another important aspect that helps provide an understanding of the intangible assets and of how knowledge flows within the organisation (Kannan and Aulbur 2004).”
A multidimensional view of intellectual capital: the impact on organizational performance (2015, methodology): “As Kannan and Aulbur (2004) argued, sustained knowledge management and IC development needs the creation of a corporate memory which is flexible and adaptive for altering requirements.”