Assessing Managerial Power Theory

By Marc van Essen, J. Otten, E. Carberry. 2015

272 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a581540df2154ed4d0e49ccb07741c4831f17e84

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Marc van Essen
2. P. Duran
3. Nadine H. Kammerlander
4. Thomas M. Zellweger
5. Sabrina F. Saleh
6. Canan C. Mutlu
7. Mike W. Peng
8. Alfredo De Massis

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Marc van Essen
2. P. Duran
3. Nadine H. Kammerlander
4. Thomas M. Zellweger
5. Sabrina F. Saleh
6. Canan C. Mutlu
7. Mike W. Peng
8. Alfredo De Massis

In Strategy and Management

1. P. Duran
2. Marc van Essen
3. Sabrina F. Saleh
4. Canan C. Mutlu
5. Thomas M. Zellweger
6. Mike W. Peng
7. Nadine H. Kammerlander
8. K. Meyer

Citations in the corpus

• Doing More with Less: Innovation Input and Output in Family Firms (2016, methodology): “MASEM tests were conducted in a two-stage procedure (Carney, Gedajlovic, Heugens, Van Essen, & Van Oosterhout, 2011).”
• Strategic CSR: A Concept Building Meta‐Analysis (2019, unknown): “With a value of 0.90, kappa signified high inter-rater agreement (see Klier et al., 2017; Van Essen et al., 2015).”
• Corporate Governance in China: A Meta‐Analysis (2018, methodology): “It is limited because the influence of time is modelled as a crude moderator effect (Combs et al., 2011) as we have done in our MARA (Van Essen et al., 2015).”