Affect and fairness: Dictator games under cognitive load
By Jonathan F. Schulz, Urs Fischbacher, Christian Thöni, Verena Utikal. 2014
210 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Demography, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a52230e8042b5d5eebf913ba18f9d0e112580a72
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Demography
In Safety Research
Citations in the corpus
- A Review and Framework for Thinking about the Drivers of Prosocial Consumer Behavior (2020, background): “Indeed, prosocial behaviors often occur automatically (Cornelissen, Dewitte, and Warlop 2011), are made in a rapid and instinctive manner (Rand, Greene, and Nowak 2012; Lotito, Migheli, and Ortona 2013), and can increase when an individual is under cognitive load (Schulz et al. 2014).”
- The Effect of Cognitive Load on Economic Decision Making (2015, background): “On the other hand, Van den Bos et al. (2006) and Schulz et al. (2014) find the opposite effect: generosity increases when subjects are under cognitive load.”
- Rethinking fast and slow based on a critique of reaction time reverse inference (2015, unknown): “Our arguments and results do not directly address the use of data from time-pressure and priming experiments, or the debates surrounding those results 5,8,57-66 .”