The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review

By Xiantao Zeng, Yonggang Zhang, J. Kwong, Chao Zhang, Sheng Li, F. Sun, Y. Niu, L. Du. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2015

1,853 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Immunology, Small Animals, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/008dd7ae268d5c6fc81cfe456d79fd152007892e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. E. Yapp
2. J. Ruiz-Hernández
3. J. Jiménez-Barbero
4. Elena Moral-Zafra
5. Ethel Quayle
6. Bartolomé Llor-Esteban

Citations in the corpus

• A systematic review of the association between rape myth acceptance and male-on-female sexual violence (2018, methodology): “Formal quality tools for the appraisal of cross-sectional studies are limited and minimal (Zeng et al., 2015), however, a new tool – referred to as “AXIS” – to assess cross-sectional studies was recently published in the BMJ (Downes, Brennan, Williams, & Dean, 2016), which proffers assessment that i”
• Influence of Parental Styles and Other Psychosocial Variables on the Development of Externalizing Behaviors in Adolescents: A Sytematic Review (2018, methodology): “Bohórquez, and Echeverry de Polanco (2016), and Zeng et al. (2015),”