The Flow Experience Across Cultures

By Giovanni B. Moneta. 2004

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4873f92d124382206a72a50065eec82f71c2230

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Work-related flow and energy at work and at home: A study on the role of daily recovery (2012, background): “Consistent with the hedonic perspective, flow theory states that flow has a direct impact on subjective well‐being by fostering the experience of happiness in the here and now (Moneta, 2004).”
Flow Experience, Culture, and Well-being: How Do Autotelic Japanese College Students Feel, Behave, and Think in Their Daily Lives? (2010, background): “Although these findings certainly indicate that flow is positively associated with psychological wellness of the Japanese, it is also true that these are only a few examples and we still know little about the features, situational/personal determinants, and behavioral/psychological implications as w”
Flow experience in physical activity: Examination of the internal structure of flow from a process-related perspective (2011, background): “In light of potential cultural differences in the nature of the activities and conditions under which flow experience is more likely to occur ( Moneta 2004 ), findings from this study cannot be generalized to other cultures until they are examined in different cultures.”
Dispositional Flow in Physical Education: Relationships With Motivational Climate, Social Goals, and Perceived Competence (2009, background): “was necessary to replicate the structure of the DFS-2 across different countries to ensure that the construction of the concept of flow was not distorted by the use of colloquialisms and other language idiosyncrasies (Fournier et al., 2006; Moneta, 2004).”