The end of the free market: who wins the war between states and corporations?

By I. Bremmer. 2010

429 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a471a60d348627f60d5e97fff48b616474bbf6e2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

A Model of China's State Capitalism (2015, neutral): “By combining (14), (7), (10) and (13), we obtain the equilibrium prices as summarized in the following lemma.”
Sino-Capitalism: China's Reemergence and the International Political Economy (2012, neutral): “9 Bremmer 2010.”
New Varieties of State Capitalism: Strategic and Governance Implications (2015, background): “Although many analysts consider the comeback of state capitalism a dysfunctional consequence of the recent global financial crisis (Bremmer, 2010), in reality the transformation we describe is a byproduct of the liberalization and privatization reforms that began after the 1980s.”
Corporate social responsibility research: the importance of context (2016, background): “Political leaders use a variety of tools (Bremmer 2010) and it is the combination of three particular tools that sets apart the Chinese system: the exercise of control as a dominant shareholder, the ability to appoint key positions in major firms, and the means to influence decisionmaking via…”
Domestic structures, foreign economic policies and global economic order: Implications from the rise of large emerging economies (2015, neutral): “However, unlike accounts that do not distinguish contemporary from older forms of state capitalism (see Bremmer, 2010; The Economist, 2012), this article maintains that the state in large emerging economies is not an all-powerful, centralised, steering bureaucracy, as in the classical developmental…”
Leviathan as a Minority Shareholder: Firm-Level Implications of State Equity Purchases (2013, background): “In this sense, our theory advances researchers’ understanding of the relatively overlooked phenomenon of minority state investment in emerging markets and contributes to the discussion about the pros and cons of state capitalism (Bremmer, 2010).”
Capitalism in China: A Centrally Managed Capitalism (CMC) and Its Future (2011, background): “These waves cited by Bremmer (2009) are rather arbitrary as many of the features he identifies had been evolving over longer periods of time and across different political and economic regimes.”
Strategizing by the government: Can industrial policy create firm‐level competitive advantage? (2015, background): “For better or worse, many governments throughout the world keep intervening in industries and firms despite the privatization and liberalization wave of the 1990s (Bremmer, 2010).”
Leviathan in Business: Varieties of State Capitalism and Their Implications for Economic Performance (2012, neutral): “…programs whereby governments decided to preserve a foothold in the governance of privatized companies—oftentimes with the objective to invite private management while at the same time keeping privatized firms as ―national champions‖ influenced by governmental policies (Bremmer, 2010).”
State Ownership and Firm Innovation in China: An Integrated View of Institutional and Efficiency Logics (2017, background): “Many researchers regard the rise of state capitalism as antithetical to market capitalism and reflecting the state’s ambition to use the market for political goals (e.g., Bremmer, 2010).”
State capitalism in international context: Varieties and variations (2020, neutral): “Bremmer (2010) also sees it as “ the state … using markets to create wealth that can be directed as political officials see fit … The ultimate motive is not economic (maximizing growth) but political ” (p. 4 – 5).”
Managing the Institutional Context for Projects (2011, background): “Clearly political context plays a decisive role (Bremmer, 2010).”
State capitalism(s) redux? Theories, tensions, controversies (2020, background): “…type of state–business relation (N€olke, 2014; Zhang and Whitley, 2013), a threat or an alternative to (Western-dominated) (neo)liberal capitalism (Bremmer, 2010; McNally, 2013), a reconfiguration of the global ‘state–capital nexus’ (van Apeldoorn et al., 2012) and the use of market mechanisms…”