Strategizing by the government: Can industrial policy create firm‐level competitive advantage?

260 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

State ownership reinvented? Explaining performance differences between state‐owned and private firms (2018, unknown): “Developmental objectives likely create rents that can be captured by SOEs, such as rents that stem from tariff protection, subsidized credit, or exclusive rights to operate in certain areas (Lazzarini, 2015; Meyer et al., 2014).”
State Ownership and Firm Innovation in China: An Integrated View of Institutional and Efficiency Logics (2017, background): “advantage (Lazzarini, 2015; Mazzucato, 2015) and how various forms of state ownership foster firms’ performance (Inoue, Lazzarini, and Musacchio, 2013; Musacchio, Lazzarini, and Aguilera, 2015).”
New Varieties of State Capitalism: Strategic and Governance Implications (2015, background): “The state can fill in voids directly (e.g., tax breaks for new R&D activity) or indirectly through the provision of country- and industry-level resources such as top universities and specialized research centers (Lazzarini, 2013).”
State Control and Corporate Governance in Transition Economies: 25 Years on from 1989 (2016, unknown): “According to the resource-based view (Makhija, 2003; Lazzarini, 2015), an important issue is not just the monitoring role of boards but also the value adding role of directors due to their human and social capital.”