Examining the Effectiveness of Solution-Focused Brief Therapy: A Meta-Analysis
By Johnny S. Kim. 2008
309 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a30919643ec0de4d0a3ce31f918ceb515b4f9549
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Stephen A. Armstrong
- R. Balkin
- Kimberly M. Jayne
- Annelies E. M. van Vianen
- B. Beersma
- Tim Theeboom
- S. O’Connor
- Dee C. Ray
Citations in the corpus
- Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context (2014, background): “Therefore, it is possible to jump directly to the ultimate aim of coaching, namely the identification of solutions, potentially resulting in a smaller number of sessions needed to make progression (Kim, 2008).”
- The differential effects of solution‐focused and problem‐focused coaching questions: a pilot study with implications for practice (2010, background): “Recent meta-analyses of counselling applications of solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) found that SFBT demonstrated positive effects (Kim, 2008; Stams et al., 2006).”
- Effectiveness of Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (2013, background): “A second meta-analytic review conducted by Kim (2008) included 22 SFBT studies involving 1,349 participants.”
- CHILD‐CENTERED PLAY THERAPY IN THE SCHOOLS: REVIEW AND META‐ANALYSIS (2015, result): “When reviewing the literature, results of this study indicate that CCPT may produce effects in externalizing problem behaviors and academic gains beyond those interventions typically accepted in schools, such as solution-focused therapy (Kim, 2008).”