Reflections on "Profiting from Innovation"
By David J. Teece. 2006
651 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a2ef6337a50af13b0bda3e2968a5fcf2c00d31d1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Strategy and Management
- Marcel Bogers
- David J. Teece
- Marcus Holgersson
- Chander K. Velu
- S. Lundan
- John H. Dunning
- Christoph Grimpe
- Ulrich Lichtenthaler
Citations in the corpus
- Technology exploitation in the context of open innovation: Finding the right ‘job’ for your technology (2010, background): “Under today’s challenging economic conditions, successful licensing may strongly contribute to sustaining superior performance by capturing value from a firm’s technologies (Arora et al., 2001; Teece, 2006).”
- Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world (2018, background): “In this paper, I look anew at the Profiting from Innovation (PFI) framework laid out in Teece (1986, 1988a, 2006).”
- The Internationalization of Corporate R&D: A Review of the Evidence and Some Policy Implications for Home Countries1 (2009, background): “…policy concern for home countries arises from the fact that particularly in the technologically advanced countries, the appropriation of returns from innovation is strongly conditioned by the surrounding institutions, especially in the area of IP protection (Granstrand, 2005; Teece, 1992, 2006).”
- Business Models and Dynamic Capabilities (2017, positive): “The business model provides a pathway by which technological innovation and knowhow combined with the utilization of tangible and intangible assets are converted into a stream of profits (Teece, 1986, 2006).”
- The Relationship between Technology, Innovation, and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence on E-Business in Europe (2008, background): “As soon as all competitors use the same (improved) process and produce the same product, no single firm in the market will be able to outperform its rivals, including the firm that first brought the innovation to the market (Teece, 1986, 2006).”