Academic dishonesty and distance learning: Student and faculty views.

By Kristen M. Kennedy, Sheri Nowak, R. Raghuraman, Jennifer D. E. Thomas, S. F. Davis. 2000

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Are Online Exams an Invitation to Cheat? (2007, background): “Our purpose is to contribute useful information to instructors as they decide whether to administer proctored or unproctored assessments in their online courses.”
To cheat or not to cheat: effects of moral perspective and situational variables on students' attitudes (2004, background): “The high prevalence of the cheating phenomenon makes it unlikely that it is carried out exclusively by those with lower moral levels, especially in light of studies reporting that about 60 per cent of students in the college age group are at Kohlberg’s fourth moral judgement stage or higher (Atkinso”
Academic Honesty and Online Courses (2006, background): “The only evidence that we are aware of regarding online cheating is a study conducted by Kennedy et al. (2000) who explore student and faculty views on cheating, but not actual behavior.”
Point, Click, and Cheat: Frequency and Type of Academic Dishonesty in the Virtual Classroom (2009, result): “Contrary to what is generally believed (Burgoon et al., 2003, George & Carlson, 1999; Heberling, 2002; Kennedy et al., 2000; Rowe, 2004; Stuber-McEwen et al., 2005), the online students in this sample reported engaging in academic misconduct less often than their on ground counterparts.”