Spatialising knowledge: placing the knowledge community of Motor Sport Valley

By Nick Henry, S. Pinch. 2000

316 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a2c872e24286f1e659d49a12c9ec1d5db5c03f08

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

In Sociology and Political Science

In Urban Studies

Citations in the corpus

Neo-Marshallian Nodes, Institutional Thickness, and Britain's ‘Motor Sport Valley’: Thick or Thin? (2001, background): “As we have argued elsewhere (Henry and Pinch, 2000a; 2000b; Pinch and Henry, 1999a), extremely high levels of interactionöboth formal and informal, overt and covertöare endemic to the workings of the industry and to the competitive edge of Motor Sport Valley.”
Making Space and Place for the Knowledge Economy: Knowledge-based Development of Australian Cities (2010, background): “…centres of knowledge generation, learning, commercialization and lifestyle that are created through a cooperative partnership between all tiers of government, the research and education community, private sector operators, highly talented professionals and the public (Henry & Pinch, 2000).”
Innovation Policy for Grand Challenges. An Economic Geography Perspective (2015, background): “The vehicles for such knowledge spillovers range from gossip, rumours and the possibility to observe competitors (Henry and Pinch 2000; Pinch and Henry 1999) to the mobility of labour (Almeida and Kogut 1999).”
Innovation, Collaboration, and Learning in Regional Clusters: A Study of SMEs in the Aberdeen Oil Complex (2003, background): “…the definition of a branch-plant economy (Cumbers, 2000), although it remains some way short of the levels of knowledge-intensive growth and entrepreneurialism characteristic of the most dynamic local and regional economies (Henry and Pinch, 2000; Keeble et al, 1999; Saxenian, 1994; Storper, 1997).”
Innovation in knowledge intensive industries: The nature and geography of knowledge links (2006, background): “This seems to be one of the most effective mechanisms to acquire some of the tacit knowledge of competitors (Saxenian, 1994 ; Henry & Pinch, 2000 ; Malmberg & Maskell, 2002 ).”
Introduction: Clusters in Urban and Regional Development (2004, methodology): “Whilst much research has consisted of case studies of successful clusters (Henry and Pinch, 2000; Keeble et al., 1999; Kenney and von Burg, 1999; Saxenian, 1994), a number of studies by economists, geographers and others have pointed to high levels of agglomeration across a broad range of…”
Spaces and scales of innovation (2001, background): “For example, recent work by Henry and Pinch (2000) highlights some of the processes that may spatialize knowledge in a region, including recruitment of staff, observation of rivals, processes of new firm formation, and the circulation of gossip and rumours through dense networks of contacts.”
Learning, innovation and regional development: a critical appraisal of recent debates (2002, background): “These relate to the identification of the mechanisms through which knowledge and information are generated and circulated within regions (Henry and Pinch, 2000; Keeble et al., 1999; Saxenian, 1994); the notion of innovation as an interactive process which helps to open up questions about the…”
Universities and Territorial Development: Reshaping the Regional Role of UK Universities (2003, background): “Meanwhile, successful regions have been associated with the growth of knowledge based clusters rooted in communities of knowledge (Henry and Pinch, 2000) and featuring high birth and growth rates of small firms, and high levels of public and private research and development (Keeble and Wilkinson,…”
Better Rules or Stronger Communities? On the Social Foundations of Institutional Change and Its Economic Effects (2006, background): “…districts and clusters (Piore and Sabel 1984; Kristensen 1992; Semlinger 1993; Burroni 2001; Becattini and Sforzi 2002; Bellandi 2002), “learning regions” (Morgan 1997; Gertler, Wolfe, and Garkut 2000; Henry and Pinch 2000; Bathelt 2001), and regional systems of innovation (Cooke and Morgan 1998).”