Learning, innovation and regional development: a critical appraisal of recent debates

By D. Mackinnon, A. Cumbers, K. Chapman. 2002

569 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e5d4e406c8bf4ace507c7384d4b1cec9eb6576a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Networking, trust and embeddedness amongst SMEs in the Aberdeen oil complex (2004, background): “Much of the literature on industrial districts and, more recently, learning regions (Morgan 1997) is underpinned by a common assumption regarding the benefits of spatial proximity in facilitating processes of interaction between firms and creating trust (MacKinnon et al. 2002).”
Sustainable regions: Governance, innovation and scale (2004, background): “‘New Regionalist’ writers are generically taken to task because they ‘take regions for granted as objects of analysis by failing to consider how they have been historically institutionalized as spaces of political-economic intervention and action’ (MacKinnon et al, 2002; MacLeod, 2001).”
Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: a bibliometric analysis (2015, background): “IS (Garcia and Calantone 2002) and territorial/regional IS (Doloreux and Parto 2005; MacKinnon et al. 2002; Moulaert and Sekia 2003; Oinas and Malecki 2002; Iammarino 2005), internationalization of IS (Carlsson 2006), local ISs (Breschi and Lissoni 2001), industrial cluster innovation (Cruz and Teix”
Evolution in Economic Geography: Institutions, Political Economy, and Adaptation (2009, background): “Our final point in this section concerns the need to view local and regional adaptation in the context of national political economies, overcoming the tendency of institutional economic geography to neglect this “missing link” (MacLeod 2001; MacKinnon, Cumbers, and Chapman 2002).”
Why do Social Innovations in Rural Development Matter and Should They be Considered More Seriously in Rural Development Research? – Proposal for a Stronger Focus on Social Innovations in Rural Development Research (2012, background): “Unlike discussions about innovative and creative milieus and learning region (MacKinnon et al. 2002; Fromhold-Eisebith 2004) aiming mainly at economic regional development, non-economic forms of regional development are explicitly addressed as well.”
Introduction: Clusters in Urban and Regional Development (2004, background): “…termed the ‘new regionalism’ in economic geography and related fields have appeared in recent years (see, for example, Lovering, 1999; MacLeod, 2001; MacKinnon et al., 2002; Cumbers et al., 2003b), there remains a marked absence of work which critically evaluates the theoretical and policy claims…”
Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues (2005, background): “Regional innovation system boundaries Questions have lately been raised over the need to address the role of extra-regional networks and institutions as mechanisms of knowledge generation and circulation in addition to processes (and institutions) within regional innovation systems [39,48,88,89,90].”
Technological Relatedness and Knowledge Space: Entry and Exit of US Cities from Patent Classes (2015, background): “MACKINNON et al. (2002) and ASHEIM and GERTLER (2005) offer reviews.”