Spaces and scales of innovation
By T. Bunnell, Neil M. Coe. 2001
575 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba61b0d2b11ee35d1178a67b29c489927385b705
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Strategy and Management
- Henry S. C. Yeung
- Michaela Trippl
- Ron A. Boschma
- Neil M. Coe
- Franz Tödtling
- Markus Grillitsch
- H. Bathelt
- Arne Isaksen
Citations in the corpus
- Institutional change in economic geography (2014, background): “Economic action and interaction are mediated through and between these scales because activities take place simultaneously at various levels, and thus have multi-scalar influences (Bunnell and Coe, 2001).”
- Growth, development, and innovation: A look backward and forward (2003, background): “The framework of spatial innovation systems focuses on the combination of local and distant connections (Oinas and Malecki 2002; Bunnell and Coe 2001 ).”
- Related Variety, Trade Linkages, and Regional Growth in Italy (2009, background): “…knowledge that is complementary, but not similar, to existing competences in the region will particularly enhance interactive learning (Bunnell and Coe 2001).7 If the external knowledge is unrelated, the industrial base of the region cannot absorb it and is unlikely to benefit from it.”
- Developing Biotechnology Clusters in Non‐high Technology Regions—The Case of Austria (2007, background): “On the one hand, these extra‐local ties comprise the relationships of regional firms to distant companies and knowledge organizations that provide access to ideas, expertise and technologies, which are not available at the regional scale (Camagni, 1991 ; Bunnel and Coe, 2001 ; Oinas and Malecki, ”
- Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there) (2003, background): “However, the communities of practice literature asserts plainly that tacit knowledge may also flow across regional and national boundaries if organizational or ‘virtual community’ proximity is strong enough ‐ a phenomenon that Bunnell and Coe (2001) refer to as the ‘de-territorialisation of closen”
- Acquisition of European research funds and its effect on international scientific collaboration. (2013, background): “Recently, economic geographers have started to pay attention to the importance of multiple „scales of innovation‟ (Bunnell and Coe 2001) including „global pipelines‟ that provide regions with access to distant knowledge sources (Bathelt et al. 2004).”
- Trading routes, bypasses, and risky intersections: mapping the travels of `networks' between economic sociology and economic geography (2006, background): “The biggest export successes of economic geography thus reproduced a local fetishism that, within economic geography, had come under increasingly fierce and substantial attack (see, for example, Oinas, 2000; Bunnell and Coe, 2001; Bresnahan et al., 2001; Coe and Bunnell, 2003).”
- Global Innovation Systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts (2017, background): “Over the last decade, authors have argued that the 19 spatial configuration of innovation systems is getting more complex, spanning actor networks and 20 institutional contexts from various places and across spatial scales (Bunnell and Coe, 2001; Carlsson 21 and Stankiewicz, 1991; Coe and Bunnell, 2”