Innovation Policy for Grand Challenges. An Economic Geography Perspective

By Lars Coenen, Teis Hansen, Josephine V. Rekers. 2015

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a58d5218a8b2745a52adb1f6ea37115f4394a44f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Public procurement, innovation and industrial policy: Rationales, roles, capabilities and implementation (2020, background): “…and market failure rationales (Smits and Kuhlmann, 2004) are felt to pay too little attention to the direction of innovation, rendering them unlikely to help address so-called ‘wicked’ problems such as poverty, climate change, etc. (Weber and Rohracher, 2012; Coenen et al., 2015; Frenken, 2017).”
Exploring the normative turn in regional innovation policy: responsibility and the quest for public value (2019, unknown): “sufficiently discussed how geography shapes the context and outcomes of transformative innovation policies (Coenen et al., 2015).”
New directions for RIS studies and policies in the face of grand societal challenges (2021, background): “A key argument is that confronting grand societal challenges requires more than technological and business innovation, namely a fundamental system change (see, for example, Markard et al., 2012; Coenen et al., 2015).”
What Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature (2016, background): “3390/su8070691 2016 Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Bugge, M. M., Hansen, T., & Klitkou, A. (2016). What is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature.”
Six critical questions about smart specialization (2019, result): “In contrast to previous generations of innovation policies, which contain a strong motivation to resolve all sort of structural failures (e.g. Coenen et al., 2015), innovation policy 3.0 involves the explicit mobilization of science, technology and innovation for meeting societal needs and…”
Demand, challenges, and innovation. Making sense of new trends in innovation policy (2018, background): “We further argue that any analysis of the role of policy for directionality of innovation must not only target the demand side, but include an analysis of the underlying demand conditions, latent societal needs, changing consumer practices, and their articulation into demands (Coenen et al. 2015; We”