Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking: a meta-analytic review.

700 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Meta-analytic Reviews in the Organizational Sciences: Two Meta-analytic Schools on the Way to MARS (the Meta-analytic Reporting Standards) (2013, methodology): “…coding procedures and experienced coders is vital as is a description of the filtering process (e.g., how many samples were excluded for lack of effect size information; see, e.g., Carey et al. 2007; Gurusamy et al. 2008; Halbert et al. 2006; McDaniel et al. 1994; Van Iddekinge et al. 2012).”
Mental Health of College Students and Their Non-college-attending Peers: Results from the National Epidemiologic Study on Alcohol and Related Conditions (2008, background): “Despite doubts about the effectiveness of treatment for drinking problems,(55-57) recent reviews and meta-analyses have shown that brief interventions with college students, including skills-based interventions, motivational interviewing, and personalized normative feedback, are effective methods fo”
Magnitude of and trends in alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24, 1998-2005. (2009, background): “…community/college cooperative interventions can reduce drinking and alcohol-related problems among college age individuals and college students (Carey et al., 2007; Hingson et al., 2005; Larimer and Cronce, 2007; NIAAA, 2007; Task Force of the National Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse and…”