A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading

By Pär Anders Granhag, Maria Hartwig. 2008

237 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a0de92cc787c7196b38ac46d85bb5bf24456133b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Political Science and International Relations

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The truth about lies: What works in detecting high‐stakes deception? (2010, background): “In addition to increasing cognitive load for liars, guilty suspects are more likely to contradict the evidence relative to innocent individuals who generally adopt a 'tell it like it happened' strategy (Granhag & Hartwig, 2008; Stromwall, Hartwig, & Granhag, 2006).”
Eliciting Reliable Information in Investigative Interviews (2014, methodology): “More recently, two new techniques use a more active approach to detect deceit, the Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) approach (Granhag & Hartwig, 2008) and the cognitive lie detection approach (Vrij, Granhag, Mann, & Leal, 2011).”
Deception Detection using Real-life Trial Data (2015, unknown): “Granhag and Hartwig [16] proposed a methodology using psychologically informed mind-reading to evaluate statements from suspects, witnesses, and innocents.”
Interviewing to detect deception (2014, background): “Liars (guilty suspects) and truth tellers (innocent suspects) generally enter interviews with different counter-interrogation strategies (Granhag & Hartwig, 2008).”
Interviewers' perceptions of impression management in employment interviews (2014, background): “But it is more common in interpersonal relations or lie detection research (e.g. Gilovich et al., 1998; Granhag and Hartwig, 2008; Bond and DePaulo, 2008).”
A cognitive approach to lie detection: A meta‐analysis (2017, methodology): “For verbal lie detection when background information is available, see the strategic use of evidence technique (Granhag & Hartwig, 2008, 2015; Hartwig, Granhag, & Luke, 2014).”
Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked (2012, methodology): “The Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) technique It is reasonable to assume that liars (guilty suspects) and truth ellers (innocent suspects) enter interviews with different counternterrogation strategies (Granhag & Hartwig, 2008).”