A Formal Theory of Reflected Appraisals in the Evolution of Power

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Opinion Dynamics and the Evolution of Social Power in Influence Networks (2015, methodology): “In the context of social influence networks, the hypothesis is empirically supported with our empirical findings [30] that individuals' self-reported self-weights, i.e., the values on the main diagonal of the weight matrix W (s), s = 1, 2, . . . , are elevated or dampened in correspondence with…”
Interpersonal Power (2015, background): “Also, power is not static but instead is a force that interacts with contextual factors and individual-difference variables (Chen et al., 2001); as such, it has broad implications too for the evolution of social networks in organizations (Friedkin, 2011).”
Structuring for team success: The interactive effects of network structure and cultural diversity on team potency and performance (2014, unknown): “The seemingly pervasive tendency in human (and many non-human) groups to centralize around one or a few individuals (Michels, 1962; Simon, 1981; cf. Friedkin, 2011) may make centralized networks easier for team members to use and to understand.”