The Individual And Joint Effects Of Race, Gender, And Family Status On Juvenile Justice Decision-Making

By M. Leiber, K. Mack. 2003

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a006ba06796c1aa78ffe1a105d7e7e2c98989dc4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Can At-Risk Youth Be Diverted From Crime? (2016, unknown): “…and minority youths might be an artifact of the long-established finding that minority youths are more likely to be treated more harshly at all levels of the criminal justice system (e.g., Fagan, Slaughter, & Hartsone, 1987; Leiber & Mack, 2003; Rodriguez, 2010; H. Smith, Rodriguez, & Zatz, 2009).”
Contexts of Decision Making in the Juvenile Justice System: An Organizational Approach to Understanding Minority Overrepresentation (2010, background): “We suggest that minorities fare less well than Whites because officials’ assessments of the socialization and supervision provided by single-parent families are affected by racial stereotypes (Bridges & Steen, 1998; Frazier & Bishop, 1995; Leiber & Mack, 2003; Pope & Feyerherm, 1993).”
Low Self‐Control and Contact with the Criminal Justice System in a Nationally Representative Sample of Males (2009, background): “…decisions holds more sway when we consider young offenders, who typically could be or are processed in the juvenile justice system, which is guided by a mandate to be more lenient in cases where youth clearly seem amenable to rehabilitation (Feld, 1999; Leiber & Mack, 2003; Kupchik, 2006).”
Is the Magic Still There? The Use of the Heckman Two-Step Correction for Selection Bias in Criminology (2007, background): “An increasing number of studies have also begun to use the Heckman approach to examine outcomes across multiple stages of criminal case processing (e.g. Kingsnorth et al. 1998; Leiber and Mack 2003; Spohn and Horney 1996; Wooldredge and Thistlewaite 2004).”
A Meta-Analysis of Juvenile Justice Risk Assessment Instruments (2008, background): “…decision-making practices that influence entry into the juvenile justice system threatens to introduce sampling biases into all risk assessment research (Chesney-Lind & Sheldon, 1998; Gaarder, Rodriguez, & Zatz, 2004; Leiber & Mack, 2003; MacDonald & Chesney-Lind, 2001; McGuire & Kuhn, 2003).”
Being Young and Black (2008, background): “Last, Leiber and Mack (2003b) found that age had an influence on intake outcomes for both Whites and African Americans.”
Race and the Impact of Detention on Juvenile Justice Decision Making (2005, result): “…making, especially at intake, for Whites and African Americans is consistent with not only previous study (e.g., DeJong & Jackson, 1998) but also the symbolic threat thesis and the premise that African Americans from single-parent households are perceived as problematic (Leiber & Mack, 2003).”