Procedural justice, legitimacy, and prisoner misconduct

By Michael D. Reisig, Gorazd Meško. 2009

302 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fd02e5ac01108b68ce1617c6a3654dfe5d4d6fb7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. J. Wooldredge
2. K. Beijersbergen
3. Paul Nieuwbeerta
4. Anja Dirkzwager
5. V. Eichelsheim
6. Benjamin M Steiner
7. P. H. van der Laan

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Benjamin M Steiner
2. J. Wooldredge
3. K. Beijersbergen
4. Paul Nieuwbeerta
5. Anja Dirkzwager
6. V. Eichelsheim
7. P. H. van der Laan
8. Wim Bernasco

Citations in the corpus

• Procedural Justice, Anger, and Prisoners’ Misconduct (2015, methodology): “Only a handful of studies have examined the effects of procedural justice on compliance in prison (e.g., Reisig & Mesko, 2009; Sparks & Bottoms, 1995).”
• Comparing Self-Report to Official Measures of Inmate Misconduct (2014, result): “…have generally reported consistent findings across models of self-report and official measures of misconduct or very similar coefficient estimates, despite some differences in the statistical significance of these effects (Komarovskaya, Loper, & Warren, 2007; Reisig & Mesko, 2009; Simon, 1993).”
• Reoffending After Release (2016, background): “On the contrary, in a study by Reisig and Mesko (2009), the relation between prisoners’ perceived procedural justice and their misconduct in a Slovene correctional facility was not mediated by perceived legitimacy.”