Political ideology, exploration of novel stimuli, and attitude formation
By Natalie J. Shook, R. Fazio. 2009
186 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9fce8264cebc07d45a602e8e12ccebdb5205b285
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Ravi Iyer
- Jesse Graham
- Jonathan Haidt
- John T. Jost
- Peter H. Ditto
- H. Nam
- Spassena P. Koleva
- Matt Motyl
In Sociology and Political Science
- John T. Jost
- Ravi Iyer
- Jonathan Haidt
- Jesse Graham
- Peter H. Ditto
- H. Nam
- Spassena P. Koleva
- Matt Motyl
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
Citations in the corpus
- Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: A look at the Cognitive Reflection Test and ideology (2015, unknown): “Psychologists and political scientists have long argued that individual-level variation in ideology is driven, at least in part, by systematic differences in cognitive style and information processing (Eidelman et al. 2012; Pacini & Epstein 1999; Shook & Fazio 2009; Sidanius 1985; Tetlock 1983).”
- Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology (2017, background): “…2007); ideological differences in approach/avoidance (Rock & Janoff-Bulman, 2010) and exploratory behavior in novel, potentially risky situations (Shook & Fazio, 2009); perceptual vigilance and physiological reactivity in response to negative and threatening stimuli (Carraro, Castelli, &…”
- The marketplace of ideology: “Elective affinities” in political psychology and their implications for consumer behavior (2017, background): “…liberals may be more neurologically attuned to the processing of novel, unexpected, and potentially contradictory pieces of information (see also Shook & Fazio, 2009).5 To investigate the notion that there would be ideological differences in physiological responses to threat, Oxley et al.…”
- Political Neuroscience: The Beginning of a Beautiful Friendship (2014, background): “…support the hypothesis that political orientation is partially rooted in basic neurocognitive mechanisms—such as those involved in conflict monitoring—that are implicated in the processing of new , unexpected , and potentially contradictory pieces of information ( see also Shook & Fazio , 2009 ) .”
- Moral Foundations Theory: The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism (2012, background): “3 Culture and social ecology As Shweder (1990) says, each culture is expert in some aspects of human flourishing, but not all.”
- Partisan Paths to Exposure Diversity: Differences in Pro‐ and Counterattitudinal News Consumption (2014, background): “Shook and Fazio (2009) found that when playing a game that permitted players to approach or avoid both positive and negative information, conservatives were more likely than liberals to adopt an avoidant strategy.”