The Explicit Syntax of Implicit Arguments

By I. Landau. Linguistic Inquiry, 2010

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/64b3c624c93c5de184564875535cf4ef19e15a7b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Mark C. Baker
2. Benjamin Bruening

In Language and Linguistics

1. Mark C. Baker
2. Benjamin Bruening
3. Ruth Kramer
4. M. Diercks
5. S. Miyagawa
6. R. Zanuttini
7. Takae Tsujioka

In Philosophy

1. Mark C. Baker
2. Benjamin Bruening
3. Ruth Kramer

Citations in the corpus

• By Phrases in Passives and Nominals (2013, background): “Instead, they are probably projected, as null arguments (Sichel 2009, 2010; Landau 2010:n. 18).”
• On Dependent Ergative Case (in Shipibo) and Its Derivation by Phase (2014, background): “More specifically, I assume that the null object in (17) is a ‘‘weak implicit argument’’ in the sense of Landau (2010); it differs from the canonical pro object in (16) in having a reduced set of nominal features.”