Review of Three Recent Randomized Trials of School-Based Mentoring and commentaries: Making Sense of Mixed Findings

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

How Effective Are Mentoring Programs for Youth? A Systematic Assessment of the Evidence (2011, methodology): “Subsequent to this review, at least three other reviews of mentoring program effectiveness have used meta-analysis (Jolliffe & Farrington, 2007; Tolan, Henry, Schoeny, & Bass, 2008; Wheeler et al., 2010).”
An interdisciplinary meta-analysis of the potential antecedents, correlates, and consequences of protégé perceptions of mentoring. (2013, background): “Perceived instrumental support refers to mentor behaviors that are geared toward facilitating protégé goal attainment (Flaxman, Ascher, & Harrington, 1988; W. B. Johnson et al., 2007; Kram, 1985; Nakkula & Harris, 2005; Spencer, 2007; Tenenbaum et al., 2001).”