Self-Explonations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems
By Michelene T. H. Chi, Miriam Bassok, Matthew W. Lewis, Peter Reimann, R. Glaser. 1989
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Richard E. Mayer
- Alexander Renkl
- Tamara van Gog
- Roxana Moreno
- K. Koedinger
- Fred Paas
- Bethany Rittle-Johnson
- Patricia A. Alexander
Citations in the corpus
- Limitations of Student Control: Do Students Know When They Need Help? (2000, methodology): “There are individual differences with respect to students' metacognitive skills, for example, the abilty to explain examples [Chi et al, 1989] or the ability to make productive use of optional on-line tools in a computer tutor [Shute and Gluck, 1996].”
- Scaffolding cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction in regular class lessons (2012, unknown): “Knowing what you don’t know has the potential to provoke the search for clarification ( Chi et al. 1989 ).”
- When Are Tutorial Dialogues More Effective Than Reading? (2007, background): “Chi et al. (2001) took advantage of the propensity of untrained tutors to lecture and first had a group of tutors work with tutees naturally. These tutors were then trained to be more interactive, for example, by using content-free prompting as much as possible. Analyses of the dialogues showed that”
- How to Optimize Learning From Animated Models: A Review of Guidelines Based on Cognitive Load (2008, methodology): “Self-explanation has proven to be a successful approach to engaging in the active processing of learning material (Chi et al., 1989; Renkl, 1997; Renkl & Atkinson, 2002; Roy & Chi, 2005).”
- Prompting Middle School Science Students for Productive Reflection: Generic and Directed Prompts (2003, methodology): “How could we design better prompts? The directed prompts used here were developed based on a theoretically-grounded understanding of the importance of identifying weaknesses (Linn, 1995), comprehension failures (Chi, 2000; Chi et al., 1989), errors (Ohlsson, 1996; Ohlsson & Rees, 1991), or impasses ”
- Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities (2009, background): “Second, if a study simply contrasts studying a worked-out solution directly with solving the same problem as the worked-out solution, then studying a worked-out solution might be superior not because it is more or less active than solving a problem, but because a worked-out solution can provide a gr”
- The Import of Knowledge Export: Connecting Findings and Theories of Transfer of Learning (2012, methodology): “Influential research by Chi and colleagues (Chi, Bassok, Lewis, Reimann, & Glaser, 1989 ) found that students who self-explained well—explaining and justifying steps in an example problem, and considering goals, consequences, and the relationships between subsequent actions—were far more successful”
- Developing Conceptual Understanding and Procedural Skill in Mathematics: An Iterative Process. (2001, background): “In addition, children with greater conceptual knowledge should be more likely to generate meaningful explanations for why the correct answer is correct and how it was generated (Chi, Bassok, Lewis, Reimann, & Glaser, 1989).”
- Toward Computer-Based Support of Meta-Cognitive Skills: a Computational Framework to Coach Self-Explanation (2000, background): “It would be unfeasible to encode these explanations by hand, especially because we ultimately want to allow instructors to easily extend the set of available examples on their own.”