Power gets the job: Priming power improves interview outcomes

By J. Lammers, David Dubois, Derek D. Rucker, Adam D. Galinsky. 2013

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9f348f2e037d27dd288a1fcdfcbd3b53e7e1c578

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Derek D. Rucker
2. David Dubois
3. Adam D. Galinsky
4. Joe C. Magee
5. N. Sivanathan
6. Theodore J. Noseworthy
7. Aparna Sundar
8. Nathan C. Pettit

Citations in the corpus

• Dynamics of Communicator and Audience Power: The Persuasiveness of Competence versus Warmth (2016, background): “For example, interviewees who reflected on possessing power were more persuasive in a mock interview compared to interviewees who reflected on lacking power (Lammers et al. 2013).”
• The dysfunctions of power in teams: A review and emergent conflict perspective (2017, unknown): “…2002; Fast, Gruenfeld, Sivanathan, & Galinsky, 2009; Galinsky, Gruenfeld, & Magee, 2003; Galinsky, Magee, Gruenfeld, Whitson, & Liljenquist, 2008; Lammers, Dubois, Rucker, & Galinsky, 2013), focused on individual rather than team outcomes (e.g., Kilduff & Galinsky, 2013; Schmid & Schmid Mast,…”