Extreme response style in cross-cultural research: An empirical investigation.

By Irvine Clarke. 2000

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e5144b85b4cc98665b40b568207ceee493befae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Relation Between Culture and Response Styles (2005, background): “…U.S. and Korean respondents (Chun & Campbell, 1974; Lee & Green, 1991), Japanese and Americans (Stening & Everett, 1984; Zax & Takahashi, 1967), members of Northern and Southern European nations (van Herk, Poortinga, & Verhallen, 2004), and between French and Australian samples (Clarke, 2000).”
An “Unfolding” Latent Variable Model for Likert Attitude Data (2007, background): “Ignoring response-style differences can result in misleading inference, especially for scales that do not balance favorable and unfavorable items (Baumgartner and Steenkamp 2001; Clarke 2000; Heide and Gronhaug 1992).”
Development of a New Measurement Tool for Individualism and Collectivism (2007, background): “For example, Bachman and O’Malley (1984) and Clarke (2000) found that African Americans and Hispanics tended to respond more extremely than non-African Americans or non-Hispanic people when using agreement scales (see also Heine, Lehman, Peng, & Greenholtz, 2002; Ji, Schwarz, & Nisbett, 2000; Peng,…”
Further Investigating Method Effects Associated With Negatively Worded Items on Self-Report Surveys (2006, background): “For example, Bachman and O’Malley (1984) and Clarke (2000) reported that minorities (Black and Hispanic) exhibit more extreme responses to Likert-type items, and Kaufman et al. (1991) reported Black–White differences in the fit of various self-esteem models.”
Cross‐cultural differences in survey response patterns (2007, background): “While many have found that gender generally is not to be associated with response styles (Bachman & O’Malley, 1984; Watkins & Cheung, 1995; Clarke III, 2000; 2001), most studies - with the exception of Marshall and Lee (1998) indicate that there are significant cultural differences. Such differences”
Response Style Differences in Cross-National Research (2012, result): “The reduction in response bias confirms earlier results for more limited group of respondents by Hui & Triandis (1989) and Clarke (2001). However, Harzing et al. (2009) found that asking respondents to rank rather than rate alternatives provided even better results in terms of a reduction of bias.”