Service regulation and growth: evidence from OECD countries

By Guglielmo Barone, F. Cingano. 2011

354 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/debb8493663a588b02048de4fd823a468900a2b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Services trade policy and manufacturing productivity: The role of institutions (2017, methodology): “…in Table 9.565 49The ratio between the cost of services inputs and the value of the downstream industry output is the proxy for direct input intensity usually adopted in the empirical literature on the indirect effect of services policies on manufacturing (see for example Barone and Cingano, 2011).”
Burden or benefit? Regulation as a dynamic influence on small business performance (2015, background): “Indirect regulatory influences reverberate through long and complex upstream and downstream (Barone and Cingano, 2011) market linkages with distant stakeholders, contributing to small firm performance effects.”
Cross sectoral FDI spillovers and their impact on manufacturing productivity (2018, background): “It has been argued that the liberalization and deregulation of services has brought substantial benefits to the manufacturing sector in the form of cost reduction, increased variety, availability and better quality of inputs (Oulton, 2001; Barone and Cingano, 2011; Bourlès et al. 2013; Arnold et al.”
Productivity growth in Italy: a tale of a slow-motion change (2018, positive): “Among the papers that focus on the impact of corruption and organized crime on the allocation of public resources, Barone and Narciso (2015) provide evidence that the presence of the mafia positively affects the probability that firms receive public subsidies and the amount of the subsidies they rec”