Gender, gender identity, and aspirations to top management
By Gary N. Powell, D. Butterfield. 2003
172 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c92f7ec4dd84dbbca8c9525842e17568029cc1a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- M. Atif
- Jodyanne Kirkwood
- Mohammed Hossain
- Barrie E. Litzky
- Samsul Alam
- Olga Stoddard
- M. Goergen
- J. Preece
Citations in the corpus
- Does board gender diversity affect renewable energy consumption? (2020, background): “Such gender-role stereotypes of women leaders also contribute to the pay gap between male and female directors (Kulich et al., 2007) since men hold most of the top positions and are likely to be associated with strong managerial attributes (Powell et al., 2002; Powell and Butterfield, 2003).”
- Why women don’t run: Experimental evidence on gender differences in political competition aversion (2015, background): “…aspirations of business students consistently report that women are significantly less likely than men to aspire to top-level management positions (Powell and Butterfield, 2003; Schweitzer, 2011), and in surveys of professional employees at leading companies, fewer women than men report hoping to…”
- Motivational factors in a push‐pull theory of entrepreneurship (2009, background): “Indeed, while women’s participation in the workforce has risen over the past 50 years or so, distinctions remain between the work that women and men do, and the levels at which they operate in the workplace (Powell and Butterfield, 2003; van de Lippe and van Dijk, 2002).”
- The relationship between gender and aspirations to senior management (2007, background): “Although these gendered role expectations have diminished over the last 30 years, Powell and Butterfield (2003)”
- Finding a ‘Normal’ Woman: Selection Processes for Board Membership (2007, background): “Similarly, Power and Butterfield (2003) found that the greater the identification of women managers with characteristics associated with senior male managers, the better their chances of realizing their ambitions.”