Which Is the Fairest One of All? A Positive Analysis of Justice Theories

By James Konow. 2003

869 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Political Science and International Relations, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9bf882c101ffd6db8966490a86b5aa2fa11a9db1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

In Political Science and International Relations

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

A Human-Centered Approach to Algorithmic Services: Considerations for Fair and Motivating Smart Community Service Management that Allocates Donations to Non-Profit Organizations (2017, background): “Some social psychologists propose that equality is the fundamental principle of a multi-criterion system favored in cooperative, as opposed to competitive, relationships [18].”
Examining equity: a multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services (2013, neutral): “Merit -based distributions hold that rewards should be proportional to individual productive contributions or sacrifices made (i.e. opportunity costs) (Konow, 2003).”
Progressive taxation and tax morale (2011, neutral): “Martinez-Vazquez and Torgler (2009) analyze tax morale in Spain and find that both the unemployment rate and inflation—measured on the regional level—are negatively related to tax morale.”
Disentangling the ‘New Liberal Dilemma’: On the relation between general welfare redistribution preferences and welfare chauvinism (2012, background): “While Konow (2003) found that reciprocity is the main driving mechanism for solidarity generally, we confirm that this also counts for solidarity towards immigrants.”
The positive psychology of sustainability (2012, background): “Similarly, equity, which is also a sustainable behavior, is strongly associated with fairness, a virtue having to do with the morally righteous, and that is based on ethics, rationality, spirituality and equity principles (Konow 2003).”
Empirical Social Choice: Questionnaire-Experimental Studies on Distributive Justice (2011, background): “A more comprehensive survey that also incorporates findings from sociological and psychological studies can be found in Konow (2003).”
Mine and yours: Property rights in dictator games (2008, background): “environment ( Konow, 2003; Walster et al., 1978).”
A normative ethical framework in climate change (2007, background): “ultimately be ascribed to Adam Smith’s impartial spectator with impartial judgment ( Konow 2003, p. 1189 ).”
Assessing the degrowth discourse: A review and analysis of academic degrowth policy proposals (2017, background): “As Konow (2003) shows in his analysis of justice theories, a fair distribution can be interpreted in many ways and might even have conflicting principles.”
A tractable model of reciprocity and fairness (2007, background): “In mini-ultimatum games, the first mover F (the “proposer”) offers one of two possible payoff vectors, and the second mover S (the “responder”) either accepts the offer, which then becomes the actual payoff vector, or else refuses, in which case the payoff is (m, y) = (0, 0).”
Do fairness and race matter in generosity? Evidence from a nationally representative charity experiment (2011, neutral): “See Fershtman and Gneezy (2001), Eckel and Wilson (2003), Bouckaert and Dhaene (2004), Burns (2006), and Haile, Sadrieh and Verbon (2006) on racial or ethnic discrimination in trust games. bad outcomes and, thus, morally unworthy of support.”
Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: A conceptual approach (2010, background): “, level of production) and that merit determines equity (Konow, 2003).”