Examining equity: a multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services
By M. McDermott, S. Mahanty, K. Schreckenberg. 2013
597 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8613b7d8c3ae14e06e68dd7a998b7d02e791b08c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Global and Planetary Change
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Citations in the corpus
- Why do farmers join Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes? An Assessment of PES water scheme participation in Brazil (2014, background): “This obviously does not guarantee that PES are equitable instruments per se, since equity goes beyond just distribution of benefit and costs, touching upon issues of decision making and overcoming of structural constrains (McDermott et al., 2012).”
- ‘Triple wins’ or ‘triple faults’? Analysing the equity implications of policy discourses on climate-smart agriculture (CSA) (2018, unknown): “…of different values, beliefs, knowledge systems and institutional arrangements (Fraser 2008), and by extension the recognition of different forms of access, constraints, capabilities and abilities to gain from a given intervention or mechanism (McDermott et al. 2013; Schreckenberg et al. 2016).”
- Cause and response: vulnerability and climate in the Anthropocene (2014, background): “…analysts and agencies turning more and more toward ‘rightsbased’ approaches to natural resource management and climate change (Roberts and Parks 2007, McDermott et al. 2012, Walsh-Dilley et al. 2013), it is important to keep in mind that the fundamental right is the right to influence those who…”
- How just and just how? A systematic review of social equity in conservation research (2018, background): “Some literature also considers context—the social, economic, environmental, and political history and circumstances—as a critical underlying factor (Sikor et al 2014), or even a fourth dimension of equity (McDermott et al 2013).”
- Experiences of host communities with carbon market projects: towards multi-level climate justice (2014, background): “They may be seen as distinct from procedural justice (McDermott et al., 2013; Schlosberg, 2004) or be considered aspects of procedural justice (Paavola, 2005).”