Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: A conceptual approach

By U. Pascual, R. Muradian, Luis C. Rodriguez, Anantha K. Duraiappah. 2010

449 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee63317982069df16595236c4befb453b8083df6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Efficiency of Payments for Environmental Services: Equity and additionality in a case study from a Biosphere Reserve in Chiapas, Mexico (2011, background): “been allocated to rural poor communities with a high percentage of indigenous people (Kaimowitz 2008; Muñoz-Piña et al. 2008; Pascual et al. 2010) even though Corbera et al.”
Examining equity: a multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services (2013, unknown): “…serve the interests of elites and intermediary organisations, while local actors lose access to significant livelihood resources without any significant benefits or influence over the terms of trade (Corbera and Brown, 2010; Kosoy and Corbera, 2010; McAfee and Shapiro, 2010; Pascual et al., 2010).”
Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism (2010, background): “Furthermore, Perfecto et al. (2005) highlight how the price difference between biodiversity-friendly and normal coffee does not have to do with compensation of opportunity costs or the real improvement in biodiversity terms at local level, but on consumption strategies at global levels (e.”
Research, part of a Special Feature on Compensation and Reward for Environmental Services in the Tropics Principles for Fairness and Efficiency in Enhancing Environmental Services in Asia: Payments, Compensation, or Co-Investment? (2010, background): “The "business" language in which PES is often expressed may be partly to blame (Lele et al. 2010, Kosoy and Corbera 2010, Pascual et al. 2010).”
Social Equity Matters in Payments for Ecosystem Services (2014, background): “…of social equity Although many conservation interventions have approached equity primarily in terms of the distribution of income or benefits (Pascual et al 2010), understanding of the social equity dimensions of conservation has become increasingly sophisticated with the recognition that…”
Fairly efficient, efficiently fair: Lessons from designing and testing payment schemes for ecosystem services in Asia (2015, background): “PES is seen as an instrument to help achieve these goals (Muradian et al., 2010; Pascual et al., 2010; van Noordwijk and Leimona, 2010).”
The Different Dimensions of Livelihood Impacts of Payments for Environmental Services (PES) Schemes: A Systematic Review (2018, background): “However, the consequences of PES schemes cannot be fully captured in terms of income as its translation into enhanced livelihoods is not linear (Pascual et al., 2010).”
Redefining payments for environmental services (2012, methodology): “According to the ECOLEP, two inter-related questions are how equity is defined in relation to PES (Pascual et al., 2010) and whether there are any a priori reasons for efficiency or equity to prevail (Muradian et al.”
Market instruments, ecosystem services, and property rights: Assumptions and conditions for sustained social and ecological benefits (2013, background): “Addressing questions of distribution and equity is not a distraction from the efficiency goals of PES but a prerequisite (Muradian et al., 2010; Pascual et al., 2010).”
Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win‐win solutions (2013, background): “Furthermore, even if ecosystem services could be smoothly integrated into markets, such process could lead to unacceptable outcomes according to local notions of fairness (Pascual et al. 2010), which constitutes an important issue for concern among policy makers and practitioners.”