Research synthesis in software engineering: A tertiary study
By Daniela Soares Cruzes, Tore Dybå. Information and Software Technology, 2011
349 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df28611f5b9990d12844d5c85bd2994419a397bf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Sairam Vakkalanka
- Kai Petersen
- Ludwik Kuzniarz
- Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic
- Martin Höst
- Björn Regnell
- Claes Wohlin
- Per Runeson
In Information Systems
- Martin Höst
- Kai Petersen
- Claes Wohlin
- Sairam Vakkalanka
- Ludwik Kuzniarz
- Per Runeson
- Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic
- Björn Regnell
Citations in the corpus
- Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update (2015, methodology): “RQ3, Venues: Around half of the studies are published in conferences and workshops, and the other half in reputable journals.”
- On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews in IS (2015, methodology): “Originally SLRs were, therefore, closely associated with meta-analysis (Clarke and Stewart, 1995; Eysenck, 1995; Thompson, 1995), a type of literature review that ‘synthesizes and combines numerical results of earlier research’ (Cruzes and Dybå, 2011).”
- Experimentation in Software Engineering (2012, background): “For more detail, refer to Cruzes and Dybå [39] and related references.”