Exploring the Lives of Asian American Men: Racial Identity, Male Role Norms, Gender Role Conflict, and Prejudicial Attitudes

By W. Liu. 2002

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ba5bfd5903616f4fc2088cd67ecfe9cf1db436b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. R. Levant
2. Katherine Richmond
3. J. O’Neil
4. Maryse Aupont
5. Keith E. Edwards
6. Jesse Owen
7. Jay C. Wade
8. Susan R. Jones

In Social Psychology

1. Katherine Richmond
2. J. O’Neil
3. Keith E. Edwards
4. Jesse Owen
5. Jay C. Wade
6. Susan R. Jones
7. R. Levant
8. Marcia B. Baxter Magolda

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. O’Neil
2. Katherine Richmond
3. R. Levant
4. Keith E. Edwards
5. Jesse Owen
6. Jay C. Wade
7. Susan R. Jones
8. K. Smalley

Citations in the corpus

• The gender role strain paradigm and masculinity ideologies. (2016, unknown): “R has found that endorsement of traditional masculinity ideology was related to college major selection (Leaper & Van, 2008), avoidance of academic help seeking among college men (Wimer & Levant, 2011), and racial group marginalization and ethnocentrism (Liu, 2002).”
• Masculinity Ideology, Male Reference Group Identity Dependence, and African American Men’s Health-Related Attitudes and Behaviors (2008, background): “In a sample of Asian American men, nontraditional masculinity related to fighting against racism and more openness to diversity (Liu, 2002).”
• Summarizing 25 Years of Research on Men's Gender Role Conflict Using the Gender Role Conflict Scale (2008, background): “Liu (2002b) also assessed a mixed sample of Asian American men and found that racial identity attitudes of confusion, ethnocentrism, and integration related to significantly greater GRC.”
• Initial Validation of the Male Role Norms Inventory-Revised (MRNI-R) (2007, background): “Although Liu (2002) compared seven different groups of Asian American men (Chinese, Japanese, Filipino, South Asian, Southeast Asian, and biracial/biethnic) on their endorsement of traditional masculinity ideology using the MRNI, he did not compare any of these groups with European Americans.”
• “Putting My Man Face On”: A Grounded Theory of College Men’s Gender Identity Development (2009, background): “Liu (2002) explored the lives of Asian American men and the interaction between adherence to the roles of traditional masculinity and their racial identity as Asian”
• Asian American Male College Students' Perceptions of People's Stereotypes About Asian American Men (2012, background): “However, based on social identity theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1986), Liu and Chang (2007) have proposed several other strategies that Asian American men might use to respond to people’s negative perceptions of them.”
• A Review of Research on Masculinity Ideologies Using the Male Role Norms Inventory (2007, background): “Similar results were found by Liu (2002) with his Asian male sample: Greater endorsement of non-traditional masculinity ideology using the MRNI was associated with higher scores on fighting against racism and more openness to diversity; and, conversely, higher endorsement of traditional masculinity…”