A Review of Research on Masculinity Ideologies Using the Male Role Norms Inventory

By R. Levant, Katherine Richmond. 2007

376 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e03faadb09876c8d9d369c8bc7f7098f7d9b249

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

Citations in the corpus

Real men don’t eat (vegetable) quiche: Masculinity and the justification of meat consumption. (2013, background): “Given that women, as a group, reject masculine ideology more than men (Levant & Richmond, 2007), it would be important to target women who lack consciousness about meat consumption.”
The Femininity Ideology Scale: Factor Structure, Reliability, Convergent and Discriminant Validity, and Social Contextual Variation (2007, methodology): “There are several versions of the Male Role Norms Inventory (MRNI; Levant et al. 1992; Levant and Richmond 2007).”
Objectifying Media (2014, methodology): “As a consequence, exposure to Objectifying TV programs would increase the conformity of men to traditional masculine norms, which, in turn, would affect genderharassing conduct (Levant & Richmond, 2007).”
Is the Marlboro man the only alternative? The role of gender identity and self-construal salience in evaluations of male models (2009, background): “Traditional masculinity is an ideology where an individual internalizes cultural attitudes toward masculinity which informs their expectations of masculine behavior ( Levant and Richmond 2007 ).”
An investigation of masculinity attitudes, gender, and attitudes toward psychological help-seeking (2015, result): “There is consistent evidence for the reliability of the subscales, and significant differences in the pattern of scores have been noted between the genders, which are similar to those found in studies examining the original MRNI (Levant & Richmond, 2007).”
A Discursive Psychological Framework for Analyzing Men and Masculinities (2014, methodology): “We will then go on to compare our approach with what we see as being the dominant North American paradigm in the psychology of men and masculinities; that is, forms of quantitative research (frequently psychometric) guided by versions of role theory (Cochran 2010; Levant & Richmond, 2007).”
The gender role strain paradigm and masculinity ideologies. (2016, positive): “In their model, the relationships between real and ideal GRC consisted of four quadrants created by two axes: low-to-high ideal GRC and low-to-high real GRC.”