Who cheats at university? A self-report study of dishonest academic behaviours in a sample of Australian university students
By Helen Marsden, M. Carroll, James T. Neill. 2005
249 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b38f5971b1d81c033d0bce64c1e88ea6f3505ee
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems and Management
In Safety Research
- Judith Gullifer
- G. Tyson
- Meagan A. Hoff
- M. Krou
- Kathleen Gray
- Rowena Harper
- K. van Haeringen
- Cath Ellis
Citations in the corpus
- Contract cheating and assessment design: exploring the relationship (2018, result): “Our findings support other international research that has highlighted cheating in engineering to be a particular problem (McCabe and Trevino 1993; Marsden, Carroll, and Neill 2005; McCabe 2016), with engineering students in this study perceiving a significantly higher likelihood of contract…”
- Exploring university students' perceptions of plagiarism: a focus group study (2010, background): “At a broader social level, Marsden, Carroll, and Neil ( 2005 ) stress that the costs to the public through inadequately trained graduates could pose a threat to public safety, welfare and financial decisions through inaccurate advice, the ramifications of which tarnish universities' reputations and ”
- Contract cheating: a survey of Australian university students (2019, background): “Much of the research has previously concluded that males are more likely than females to cheat (Bertram Gallant, Binkin, and Donahue 2015; Kremmer, Brimble, and StevensonClarke 2007; Marsden, Carroll, and Neill 2005; McCabe 2016).”
- In their own words: a qualitative study of the reasons Australian university students plagiarize (2007, background): “…the methodology of many recent studies of Australasian students is reliant on participants’ responses to standard survey items to identify reasons for plagiarism (e.g. Sheard et al., 2003; Brimble & Stevenson-Clarke, 2005; Hasen & Huppert, 2005; Marsden et al., 2005; Marshall & Garry, 2005).”
- Achievement Motivation and Academic Dishonesty: A Meta-Analytic Investigation (2020, background): “Marsden et al. (2005) found that these differences in task and form can influence the relation between motivation and academic dishonesty.”