Relation of working memory to off-line and real-time sentence processing in children with specific language impairment
By J. Montgomery. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2000
156 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b2feae23f7a72c84422ef3782b7a52f00faac00
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Constraints in the Production of Written Text in Children with Specific Language Impairments (2007, unknown): “…the high cognitive demands placed on the individual in creating written text may overload a working memory system that is, arguably, reduced in processing capacity in children with SLI (Ellis Weismer, Evans, & Hesketh, 1999; Gathercole & Baddeley, 1990; Montgomery, 2000; Windsor & Hwang, 1999).”
- Does impaired grammatical comprehension provide evidence for an innate grammar module? (2002, unknown): “Montgomery (1995, 2000) found that children with SLI showed deficits in both phonological memory capacity (as evidenced by poor repetition of polysyllabic nonwords) and working memory (as evidenced by poor recall of word lists when required to organize the recalled words into semantic category and ”
- Proficiency and working memory based explanations for nonnative speakers’ sensitivity to agreement in sentence processing (2012, methodology): “WM capacity was assessed by asking the participants to report a list of English words they had heard in order of sizes (i.e., from smallest to largest; for details, see Montgomery, 2000).”
- The Role of Processing Limitations in Early Identification of Specific Language Impairment (2002, background): “…& MacWhinney, 1999; Montgomery, 1995, 2000a,b); 5) decreased verbal working memory on a listening span task (Ellis Weismer, Evans, & Hesketh, 1999; Montgomery, 2000a,b); and 6) slower speed of processing of linguistic, as well as nonlinguistic, material (Johnston & Ellis Weismer, 1983; Miller et…”