Real-Time Strategy Game Competitions

By Michael Buro, David Churchill. 2012

74 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Economics and Econometrics

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Ian D. Watson
2. Glen Robertson
3. Graham Erickson
4. Luiz Chaimowicz
5. Michael Buro
6. Victor do Nascimento Silva
7. David Churchill
8. Marc Lanctot

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Glen Robertson
2. Ian D. Watson
3. Graham Erickson
4. Michael Buro

Citations in the corpus

• MOBA: a New Arena for Game AI (2017, background): “Specially, the Brood War version of Starcraft became very popular among researchers, being used in many works and competitions [6].”
• A Survey of Real-Time Strategy Game AI Research and Competition in StarCraft (2013, unknown): “Finally, the paper concludes on discussions and perspectives.”
• Global State Evaluation in StarCraft (2014, background): “The research community is currently focusing on developing bots to play against each other, since RTS AI still preforms quite poorly against human players (Buro and Churchill 2012).”
• A Review of Real-Time Strategy Game AI (2014, methodology): “…have a vast space of actions and game states, with durative actions, a huge branching factor, and actions which can have long-term effects throughout the course of a match (Buro and Churchill 2012; Buro and Furtak 2004; Mehta et al. 2009; Ontañón 2012; Tozour 2002; Weber, Mateas, and Jhala 2010).”