Dan Brockington, Rosaleen Duffy, and Jim Igoe: Nature unbound: conservation, capitalism and the future of protected areas
By Alejandro Camargo. Agriculture and Human Values, 2014
656 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Geography, Planning and Development, History and Philosophy of Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ab27778ec2249a0f63c5207f3a54a102b52b59f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geography, Planning and Development
- Catherine A. Corson
- Diana Ojeda
- P. McElwee
- I. Bryceson
- R. Fletcher
- W. Dressler
- Bram Büscher
- Maan Barua
In History and Philosophy of Science
- Catherine A. Corson
- Diana Ojeda
- P. McElwee
- I. Bryceson
- R. Fletcher
- W. Dressler
- Bram Büscher
- Maan Barua
Citations in the corpus
- Green pretexts: Ecotourism, neoliberal conservation and land grabbing in Tayrona National Natural Park, Colombia (2012, background): “For literature on the relation between capitalism and conservation, including recent discussions on neoliberal conservation see, for example, Katz (1998), Neumann (1998), Conservation and Society (2007), Brockington et al.”
- Nonhuman labour, encounter value, spectacular accumulation: the geographies of a lively commodity (2017, background): “Most articulations of spectacular accumulation gravitate toward its representational tropes (Brockington et al. 2008), but this analysis emphasises how the spectacle is contingent on particular lively affordances of the animals themselves.”
- Lively commodities and encounter value (2016, background): “Critical for accumulation within conservationist modes of production are spectacular encounters with virtual images of charismatics (Brockington et al., 2008).”
- Payments for ecosystem services as neoliberal conservation: (Reinterpreting) evidence from the Maloti-Drakensberg, South Africa (2012, background): “…related practices that aim to substitute social and political affairs by capitalist market dynamics in all facets of life, including conservation (for in-depth discussions, see, amongst others, Brockington et al. 2008; Büscher 2010, In press; Sullivan 2009; Fletcher, 2010; Büscher et al. In press).”
- Conservation, green/blue grabbing and accumulation by dispossession in Tanzania (2012, background): “Fourth, neoliberal economic policies have had great influence on conservation policy in general during the last two decades (Sullivan 2006, Heynen et al. 2007, Brockington et al. 2008, Igoe and Sullivan 2009, Büscher 2010).”
- Market-oriented conservation governance: The particularities of place (2012, background): “Consequently, we now have a clearer picture of the ‘business of conservation’, its inner workings, assumptions and assertions (Brockington et al., 2008) and its ability to entice a large variety of actors to adopt markets as a panacea to solving the current environmental crisis (Büscher and Dressler”
- Accumulation by Conservation (2014, background): “Brockington et al. (2008), importantly, point out that prior to these, areas that resemble today’s protected areas had been created in various forms in many parts of the world.”
- Payments for environmental services as neoliberal market-based forest conservation in Vietnam: Panacea or problem? (2012, background): “…the tradeoff of new protected areas in return for destructive development elsewhere, such as hydrodams; and the creation of new forms of capital, such as securities in endangered species (Liverman, 2004; Igoe and Brockington, 2007; Büscher, 2008; Brockington et al., 2008; Igoe et al., 2010).”
- Market mechanism or subsidy in disguise? Governing payment for environmental services in Costa Rica (2012, background): “…of conservation can be viewed as elements, in part, of capital accumulation in their own right, seeking to commodify natural resources for economic return (e.g., Sullivan, 2006, 2009; Igoe and Brockington, 2007; Garland, 2008; Brockington et al., 2008; Büscher, 2010; Brockington and Duffy, 2010).”
- Territorialization, enclosure and neoliberalism: non-state influence in struggles over Madagascar's forests (2011, background): “The enclosure of a park’s image can be a form of primitive accumulation, where processes of capital accumulation are launched via the consumption of conservation images and values (Brockington et al. 2008, Carrier and West 2009, Igoe et al. 2010).”
- Trends in local wildlife hunting, trade and control in the Tropical Andes Biodiversity Hotspot, northeastern Peru (2012, background): “…finding as it is suggested that to attract larger amounts of funding, contemporary international conservation organisations tend to increase the scale of their planning and operations rather than to focus on local awareness and politics (Chapin 2004, Adams & Hutton 2007, Brockington et al. 2008).”
- Conservation in tropical Pacific Island countries: why most current approaches are failing (2012, background): “Different perceptions of “no-take zones” versus “subsistence-use” zones and other aspects of conservation (West 2006; Brockington et al. 2008) require intensive and continuing dialogue and education between landowners and the implementing organization(s) at all stages.”