Market mechanism or subsidy in disguise? Governing payment for environmental services in Costa Rica

By R. Fletcher, Johannes Breitling. 2012

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/74c08ac5206400c3573f54662b07893acb49a988

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. R. Fletcher
2. Bram Büscher
3. Elizabeth Shapiro‐Garza
4. J. Dempsey
5. Daniel Suarez
6. E. Corbera

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Elizabeth Shapiro‐Garza
2. Bram Büscher
3. J. Dempsey
4. R. Fletcher

In Strategy and Management

1. Bram Büscher
2. Elizabeth Shapiro‐Garza
3. R. Fletcher

Citations in the corpus

• Contesting the market-based nature of Mexico’s national payments for ecosystem services programs: Four sites of articulation and hybridization (2013, background): “…water supplies, can present significant obstacles to its complete capitalization (Mansfield, 2004; Bakker, 2005; Robertson, 2000, 2004) and PES schemes in the global south primarily continue as state subsidies rather than markets (Fletcher and Breitling, 2012; McElwee, 2012; Xuan To et al., 2012).”
• Arrested Development? The Promises and Paradoxes of “Selling Nature to Save It” (2016, background): “…not only encompass but require substantial public funding, command-and-control legislation, and other elements seemingly anathema to “truly” market-oriented approaches (see Fletcher [2014] for review; see also Fletcher and Breitling 2012; McAfee 2012a; Milne and Adams 2012; Shapiro-Garza 2013).”
• Accumulation by Conservation (2014, background): “…a (global) subsidy system, redistributing resources to support conservation under the recurring assurance that this is merely a short-term support for the effort to generate self-sustaining markets, to eventually be withdrawn once such markets finally materialise (see Fletcher and Breitling 2012).”
• The PES Conceit: Revisiting the Relationship between Payments for Environmental Services and Neoliberal Conservation (2017, background): “a number of prominent PES programmes, including in Cambodia (Milne and Adams 2012), Costa Rica (Fletcher and Breitling 2012),”