Market-oriented conservation governance: The particularities of place

By Robin Roth, W. Dressler. 2012

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/65f5a2c0b09d3f2dc3629fbfdf699a457ef8a7a5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Bram Büscher
2. E. Corbera
3. R. Fletcher
4. T. Benjaminsen
5. C. Cavanagh
6. C. Spash
7. Catherine A. Corson
8. E. Gómez‐Baggethun

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Bram Büscher
2. C. Spash
3. C. Cavanagh
4. Catherine A. Corson
5. R. Fletcher
6. E. Corbera
7. T. Benjaminsen

Citations in the corpus

• Bulldozing biodiversity: The economics of offsets and trading-in Nature (2015, background): “People may donate for a good cause without the amount representing the value of an object the cause supports (Ryan and Spash, 2011; Spash, 2000b).”
• Accumulation by Conservation (2014, background): “…less as a process of replacement of one mode of conservation by another than as an intensification, an effort to increasingly commodify conservation over time as a new strategy is superimposed over and fuses with others in diverse hybrid forms (see Dressler and Roth 2010, Roth and Dressler 2012).”
• Virtual nature, violent accumulation: The ‘spectacular failure’ of carbon offsetting at a Ugandan National Park (2014, background): “Much recent work in political ecology has critically engaged with the production of ostensibly ‘socio-natural’ commodities (Arsel and Büscher, 2012; Büscher and Arsel, 2012; Büscher et al., 2014; Fletcher, 2012; Peluso, 2012; Roth and Dressler, 2012), and especially so within the politicized context”
• Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services (2012, background): “This conservation approach is unsurprisingly subject to the ‘particularities of place’ and varying degrees of public and private intervention and re-regulation that characterize the ‘neoliberalization of nature’ [13,14,15 ,16,17,18 ].”
• The political ecology of ecosystem services (2015, unknown): “In many cases, they are mostly used by States to reinforce their environmental agendas without allowing new directions in such policies (Roth and Dressler, 2012; McElwee, 2012), so that policies and practices around the ES concept deviate considerably from neoliberal doctrine (Dempsey and…”
• Grabbing “Green”: Markets, Environmental Governance and the Materialization of Natural Capital (2013, background): “…Inc. (e.g., Arsel and Büscher 2012), neoliberal conservation (e.g., Igoe and Brockington 2007), and market-oriented conservation governance (e.g., Roth and Dressler 2012) by underscoring the importance of understanding the systemic dimensions and “logics” mobilizing how state, private, and…”